Let me be clear about what this article is and isn't. It is not against solar. Minnesota's clean-energy goals are good, rooftop solar is a legitimate product, and plenty of Minnesotans have installed it and been glad they did. This is about the sales and financing — the door-knock, the pitch, and a fee so well-hidden that most people who pay it never know it exists.

I've spent my career reading the fine print that companies write knowing you won't. This is one of the cleverest hiding jobs I've seen.

The $9,000 you can't see

Here's how solar financing actually works, straight from a federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau investigation in 2024. When you finance a solar system — and most people do; loans were 58 percent of the residential-solar market — the lender charges the installer a "dealer fee" for offering the low advertised interest rate. That fee, the CFPB found, "typically ranges from between 10 to 30 percent of the cash price but can exceed 50 percent." And it gets baked invisibly into the amount you finance.

The Bureau's own worked example: a system that costs $30,000 in cash carries a 30 percent dealer fee of $9,000 — so the loan is written for $39,000. The lender pays the installer the $30,000 and keeps the $9,000. And here's the trick: because it's structured as part of the price rather than a finance charge, it never shows up as the cost of your credit. The "0% financing" is real in the sense that the interest rate is low. It's a lie in the sense that you're paying $9,000 for the privilege — a cash buyer gets the identical panels on the identical roof for $30,000; you pay $39,000 for the same thing and are told you got a great rate.

The fee hides under names like "dealer fees," "platform fees," and "original issue discounts." It targets exactly who you'd fear: of 8.4 million solar ads studied over 2021–23, 2.8 million — a third — were aimed at older adults.

When the company vanishes and the loan doesn't

There's a second trap, and 2024 made it vivid. The solar industry has been going through a wave of bankruptcies — SunPower, one of the biggest names, filed Chapter 11 in August 2024, and its assets were sold off and rebranded. When an installer or financier collapses, here's what happens to the customer: the panels, the loan, and the warranty don't travel together. The company that promised to service your system is gone; other technicians won't touch a competitor's install; and the one thing that survives the bankruptcy fully intact is your loan. You're left making 20 years of payments — including that hidden $9,000 — on a system nobody will fix.

Leases and power-purchase agreements add their own problems: escalator clauses that raise your payment every year, and liens on your home that can turn a routine house sale into a legal mess. The point isn't that any of these is inherently fraudulent — it's that the sales pitch never mentions them.

Federal enforcement — and one Minnesota-specific caution

The FTC has gone after the worst actors. It sued a set of solar telemarketers — Vision Solar, Solar Xchange, and their principal — in 2023 as part of a crackdown on illegal robocalls, resulting in a $13.8 million civil penalty over tens of millions of calls to people on the Do Not Call list. That's the sales-side abuse.

One thing I want to get right for Minnesotans specifically, because the national horror stories don't all apply here: the worst residential PACE financing disasters — where a solar loan becomes a super-priority lien that can cost you your home — happened in California, Florida, and Missouri. Minnesota only authorizes commercial PACE, not residential. So that particular nightmare isn't Minnesota's. I'd rather tell you that than scare you with someone else's problem.

The protection Minnesota already gives you

Here's the good news, and it's the practical one. Minnesota's door-to-door sales law already covers you. Under Minn. Stat. §§ 325G.06–.11, when a salesperson sells you solar at your door, you have three days to cancel — no reason required — and the seller is legally required to hand you a written, boldface notice of that cancellation right. If they didn't, or if they misled you, the law gives you a private right of action with fee-shifting — meaning you can actually take them to court and recover your attorney's fees.

That's a real tool, and most people who get the high-pressure driveway pitch don't know they have it. The gap here isn't the law. It's awareness and enforcement.

What we can do

Force the dealer fee into the light. The single most important fix is a disclosure rule: if there's a $9,000 fee baked into the loan, the buyer must see it, in dollars, next to the cash price, before signing. Some states are moving toward requiring dealer-fee disclosure. Minnesota should, so "0% financing" can't hide a 30 percent markup.

Publicize the 3-day right — in the pitch's own language. Minnesotans already have the right to cancel a door-to-door solar sale. The Attorney General's office should make that right loud and easy to find, so the person on the porch with the tablet knows they can walk it back tomorrow morning.

Protect the orphaned customers. When a solar company goes bankrupt, the homeowner shouldn't be the only party still fully obligated. Warranty-transfer and servicing protections would keep a corporate failure from becoming a homeowner's dead system with a live loan.

And go after the bad sales, not the good product. The FTC showed the model — the target is deceptive telemarketing and hidden fees, not solar itself. Minnesota's consumer-protection office can bring the same cases here.

Rooftop solar can be a genuinely good deal for a Minnesota family. The way to keep it that way is to make the salesperson show the whole price — including the part they've spent a lot of effort hiding. First the facts. Then the fix.


Sources

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, "Issue Spotlight: Solar Financing" (Aug. 7, 2024), read from the CFPB materials: the finding that hidden dealer fees "typically range from between 10 to 30 percent of the cash price but can exceed 50 percent"; the worked example of a $30,000 cash system financed at $39,000 after a $9,000 (30 percent) dealer fee not disclosed as a cost of credit; loans as 58 percent of the 2023 residential-solar market; and the finding that 2.8 million of 8.4 million solar advertisements over 2021–23 targeted older adults. FTC enforcement: United States v. Solar Xchange LLC (FTC Matter 2223063; D. Ariz. No. 2:23-cv-01387, filed July 18, 2023), naming Vision Solar LLC, Solar XChange LLC, and Mark Getts, part of "Operation Stop Scam Calls," resulting in a $13.8 million partially suspended civil penalty over tens of millions of calls to Do Not Call-listed numbers. The SunPower Chapter 11 filing (Aug. 5, 2024) and the resulting orphaned-customer problem as documented in industry reporting. Minnesota law: the three-day right to cancel a door-to-door solar sale (Minn. Stat. § 325G.07), the mandatory written boldface cancellation notice (§ 325G.08), and the fee-shifting private right of action (§ 325G.11), verified verbatim against raw text at revisor.mn.gov; and Minn. Stat. § 216C.436, which authorizes only a commercial PACE loan program, meaning Minnesota does not authorize residential PACE.

No Minnesota Attorney General or Commerce enforcement action against solar sellers was located this pass and none is asserted; lease-escalator percentages, additional installer/financier bankruptcies, and specific state solar-disclosure laws were flagged for verification and are described in general terms only. Corrections: campaign@madgettformn.com.

More in Minnesota by the Numbers

Every article in this series is built from primary sources and lists what it could not verify.

2026 Voter Guides →  •  The Platform →